The craftiest of them do this to hook us in.
(And it’s possible less woman than ever today are actually trying to do this. Or they are but they’ve gotten worse at it because of feminism, they are in their masculine, etc.)
They make themselves appear less intelligent. Making themselves seem childlike in ways. They can therefore sell themselves as both sex object and child.
Therefore reaping the benefits and power of both children and lover (someone a man will doubly want to protect).
The person that truly ends up loving is not the protected but the protector (the protector loves his protected but not the other way around).
The protector has their nurturing instinct activated. The protected on the other hand has their self preservation instinct activated (a selfish survival one…hypergamy?).
So long term can the woman in this dynamic feel sexual arousal for the man?
Author Esther Vilar argues that a woman with a normal sex drive seldom sees a desirable lover in the man she has chosen for his usefulness as a provider. And that many women actually end up feeling a positive revulsion against having sex with their “father substitute.”
This is fascinating for me to think about because I’d been thinking for awhile that women are actually looking for the Daddy-Daughter dynamic in potential partners. And maybe they are looking for that for longer term partners, ones they’ll ultimately not want to end up having sex with.
(Although I do still think Push-Pull dynamics was born out of the Daddy-Daughter Dynamic and Push-Pull does create attraction)
Leave a Reply